So here’s the polar* opposite of the first poll I ran on Linked on the topic of ‘influencers’. (see PART A, the previous post to this.)
Part A took a look at the downside of using social media influencers.
Part B, this one, took a look at the upside of using social media influencers.
Here are the poll results:
Question:
Which do you think is the most positive factor/most likely outcome when using top social media influencers to market your product, B2C?
Answer(s):
1) Increased Reach & Visibility 71%
2) Authentic Engagement 29%
3) Targeted Marketing 0%
4) High-Quality Content Creation 0%
(Of course, this is all quite clear in the graphic above, but worth trotting it out here too.)
Here’s what I am seeing:
- The level of response among my LinkedIn community was not as strong as it was for PART A last week. Perhaps one of the reasons is that people thought it was the same poll running for a second week, and didn’t pick up on the fact that it was a PART B! And I didn’t get the same comment engagement as before, I assume for the same reason. I’ll have to give more thought to ‘differentiation’ for my posts in the future. I really should, because that’s what my business is all about!
- The previous observation notwithstanding**, the response had some validity in that they skewed hugely toward the first two options, and especially towards the first.
- The third and fourth choices Targeted Marketing and High-Quality Content Creation (which is primarily the purview of the influencer, since they are getting paid handsomely, usually), didn’t got a look-in.
So this might lead me to conclude that it’s not so much the market quality of an influencer’s following that matters most. It’s the quantity.
Food for thought.
*no pun intended.. well, actually, yes intended, I can NEVER resist a pun.
**one of the finest words every coined, I use it wherever it fits!